
Well, last night’s Premier League game just about summed up Tottenham Hotspur’s season.
Ange Postecoglou’s side came into the match against Nottingham Forest likely still ecstatic off the back of their Europa League quarter-final triumph away to Eintracht Frankfurt, but instead of building on that momentum, they fell back into old habits.
It took all of five minutes for the visitors to go one-nil up courtesy of a long-range effort from Elliot Anderson that rebounded off Rodrigo Bentancur.
Then, just 15 minutes later, Chris Wood doubled the Tricky Trees’ lead with a well-taken header helped by some terrible goalkeeping from Guglielmo Vicario.
While it wasn’t the worst performance of the Lilywhites’ season, there were still plenty of starters who left a lot to be desired, including Richarlison.
Richarlison’s game vs Forest
Now, before the pitchforks come out, it’s only fair to commend Richarlison on the goal he scored in the 87th minute – a lovely header from a pinpoint Pedro Porro cross.
However, if we are being honest, that was pretty much the only good thing he did in the entire game, and had he been on song, he could and probably should have got, at the very least, a couple more.
In fact, aside from a few missed chances, he was practically anonymous for the majority of the game and offered very little in the way of build-up play or support for his teammates.

Performance in Numbers
Want data and stats? Football FanCast’s Performance in Numbers series provides you with the latest match analysis from across Europe.
It was a display in stark contrast to what we saw from Dominic Solanke on Thursday night.
It might sound harsh, but London World’s Toby Bryant shares this opinion, as he gave the Brazilian a 6/10 match rating at full-time and wrote that he ‘needs to be available to receive the ball so much more.’
Richarlison’s game in numbers |
|
---|---|
Minutes |
95′ |
Expected Goals |
1.48 |
Goals |
1 |
Expected Assists |
0.00 |
Assists |
0 |
Touches |
21 |
Key Passes |
0 |
Big Chances Missed |
3 |
Passing Accuracy |
3/6 (50%) |
Dribbles (Successful) |
4 (0) |
Duels (Won) |
9 (0) |
Crosses |
0 |
Fouls |
2 |
Lost Possession |
10 |
All Stats via Sofascore |
His statistics don’t make for pleasant reading either, as in 95 minutes of action, he scored just a single goal from an expected goals figure of 1.48, didn’t even register 0.01 expected assists, missed three big chances, failed in 100% of his dribbles, took just 21 touches, made three passes all game, lost nine of nine duels, committed two fouls and lost the ball ten times.
In short, it wasn’t a great night for the former Everton star, although he did at least get on the scoresheet, which cannot be said about another of the starters who put in a terribly disappointing display.
The Spurs star worse than Richarlison
Unfortunately, you could name quite a few players here, from Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero to Bentancur and Pape Matar Sarr.
Still, when it comes down to it, Dejan Kulusevski was potentially the most disappointing of the lot.
Like Richarlison, the Swedish international was mostly a passenger last night, but unlike the Brazilian, he wasn’t able to pop up with a goal, as his effort in the second half was cleared off the line.
Moreover, apart from that one effort, it’s hard to think of a single positive thing the former Juventus star did, which is made all the worse by the fact the North Londoners had 70% of the possession.
Again, this is an opinion shared by Bryant, who awarded the midfielder just a 5/10 match rating at full-time, writing that he was ‘generally sluggish,’ which is not what you want to hear about someone considered to be one of your very best players. Truth be told, it was perhaps one of his poorest nights of the campaign.
Kulusevski’s game in numbers |
|
---|---|
Minutes |
67′ |
Goals |
0 |
Assists |
0 |
Touches |
38 |
Key Passes |
1 |
Big Chances Missed |
1 |
Dribbles (Successful) |
2 (1) |
Duels (Won) |
11 (3) |
Crosses |
0 |
Long Balls |
0 |
All Stats via Sofascore |
Unsurprisingly, his statistics from the night back up this assessment, as in 67 minutes of action, he amassed a combined expected goal and assists figure of just 0.10 to rubberstamp how mediocre a night it was for one of their star men.
Furthermore, his touch count of only 38 meant he had 15 fewer than Van de Ven and six fewer than Romero, a stat that’s made worse by the fact the defensive duo left the field at the interval.
Ultimately, Richarlison and Kulusevski looked like players who were still getting back to full fitness, but with a must-win game coming up next Thursday, they need to get there quickly, especially the Swede.

Related
Solanke upgrade: Spurs scout “one of the best strikers in the Bundesliga”
The goalscoring machine would be an excellent addition to Spurs’ squad.